Writing and placing short stories may be fun and gratifying, but it’s not a way to get rich. Short story writers write their work and submit to journals without expectation of payment most of the time. That may be unfortunate, but it’s the truth.
And it used to be true that the whole process was free from looking up your market in Duotrope to submitting via Submittable (formerly SubMishMash) as long as you didn’t submit to a place that charged reading fees, or contest fees (something I’ve discussed on the blog previously. In short, I don’t believe in paying reading or contest fees.)
But beginning Jan 2013, the Duotrope database has started requiring payment – either $5 a month or $50 if you sign up for a full year. Here’s what Duotrope says about what you can no longer access:
If I don’t subscribe, what will I miss out on?
- You will no longer be able to run searches or browse the index of listings.
- The information shown on individual market listings will be limited.
- You won’t be able to access our calendar of deadlines, statistical reports*, or RSS feeds.
- You will lose access to your control panel, including your submissions tracker
I have mixed feelings about it because I think Duo is a fantastic resource and I’ve enjoyed using it over the years, however, I think $50 for a one year subscription is too steep for most writers who are not getting paid for their work. If it had been half that I would have grumbled but signed up. At $50, I’m not signing up on principle, for now.
Also, I don’t see how the statistics on Duotrope will improve if they have a much smaller number of users reporting their submissions. I suspect the veracity of those statistics will plummet in usefulness unless they achieve a critical mass of people willing to pay. For the sake of Duotrope’s long term viability, I’d suggest they report on the number of paying subscribers they have in order to make clear the total population available to report their subs, but that’s my opinion.
And as for tracking my submissions on Duo, I was doing it more as a service to the editors of the journals where I submitted my work. I keep a separate tracking spreadsheet on my computer that has many more notes and information I find relevant. But individual markets — especially new markets — will potentially suffer from being under-reported due to a lack of user base for Duo because I strongly suspect the majority of users will not pay that fee.
Here are some alternatives for people who need to be able to browse listings to find small press markets to target.
Alternative small press literary magazine listings:
- Poets & Writers Literary Magazines Database - http://www.pw.org/literary_magazines?&perpage=*
- Flash Fiction Markets at EverdayFiction – http://www.everydayfiction.com/flashfictionblog/flashmarkets/
- Every Writer’s Resource – Lit Mag Listings – http://www.everywritersresource.com/literarymagazines/
I’d like to hear from people on this one. Have you signed up for Duo, and if so, what was your thinking? If you decided not to use it, was it because of the expense or some other reason?
Filed under: Small Literary Magazines, Story Submissions, Writing, Writing Tools | Tagged: database of small literary magazines, Duotrope, Every Writer's Resource database, Flash Fiction Markets listing, Poets & Writers database, small literary magazines, writing, writing tools | 5 Comments »